Limit global warming and meet carbon targets by decarbonising the grid says EUA
25th Oct 2016
“Injecting green gas directly into the gas grid is the best and most cost effective way of meeting our carbon targets” says Energy and Utilities Alliance Head of external Affairs, Isaac Occhipinti. His comments come following the announcement that the United Nations has formally agreed plans for a new global warming study.
Mr Occhipinti continued,
“The gas grid currently delivers gas into the homes of over 85% of the UK population and there is little appetite to simply abandon gas and start again with a new system, not to mention the enormous costs involved.
EUA has been consistently and repeatedly championing the gas grid and the role it can play in decarbonising heat, which is central to our future climate change obligations and frankly, it has been a Cinderella area of public policy. Well it is time for Cinders to go to the ball, and we need that full debate over the best way to decarbonise heat. Because of its existing reach, cost efficiency and ability to store energy - using the gas grid is key, and so greening the gas that flows through the pipes, whether with biogas, bioSNG, or hydrogen is the obvious solution.
There needs to be a thorough, evidence-based debate about how this is achieved. But to help, BEIS need to signal that they are interested in this area of policy. Industry is already working on solutions, but they need BEIS's buy-in to encourage the wider debate about planning for our future energy needs, in a decarbonised world, and using the UK's hidden asset - its gas grid.”
The study will aim to guide the world's nations on how to limit warming to 1.5 degrees, providing an outline of low-carbon development pathways. An outline of the report can be found here.
Latest News
-
15th Jun 2026A plea on behalf of the public, “cut out the spin and just be honest.”
-
8th Jun 2026Why is saving a tonne of carbon in the UK more important than Nepal?
-
1st Jun 2026 -
18th May 2026 -
11th May 2026Heat pumps: were falling costs always a bit of wishful thinking?
